From Manuel’s podcast and consultation knowledge
Resolving conflict
Conflict is not caused by different opinions alone. Needs, expectations and vulnerable points often collide without being expressed clearly.
What lies beneath a conflict?
Two people can perceive the same situation differently. It becomes difficult when interpretations are treated as facts and both sides only defend their position.
A specific wish often sits beneath an accusation: respect, reliability, closeness, freedom or understanding. Clear wishes make solutions more possible.
Why do conversations escalate?
Old hurts, sweeping statements and the urge to be right narrow the conversation. When arousal is high, listening becomes much harder.
A pause is not avoidance if you agree when to continue the conversation calmly.
Manuel's practical tip
Manuel's practical tip
Prepare a difficult conversation on a four-sentence card. Each sentence has only one purpose, making it less likely that observation and accusation blur together.
Try it this way:
- 1
“I noticed …” — without always, never or a judgement of character.
- 2
“The effect on me is …” and “What matters to me is …”
- 3
“My specific request is …” — one request that can be clearly understood.
What may help right now
- 1
Settle the tension first
If voices rise or you only want to attack, pause and agree on a specific time to continue.
- 2
Describe rather than judge
Say what you observed without “always”, “never” or a diagnosis of the other person.
- 3
Name the impact and your request
Explain what the situation does to you and what you are asking for. A request is clearer than a hidden accusation.
- 4
Check what you understood
Summarise the other view in your own words. Understanding does not automatically mean agreeing.
- 5
Agree on one observable step
“We will communicate better” is too vague. Decide who will do what by when and when you will review it.
What you can do today
- Write observation, feeling, need and request as four separate sentences.
- Remove “always” and “never” from your opening line.
- Choose a time when both people can genuinely talk.
What matters in the longer term
Being good at conflict does not mean avoiding disagreement. It means addressing differences without attacking another person’s dignity or safety.
When threats, violence or control are present, safety comes before communication skills. Seek distance and suitable support.
Questions that may help
- What happened without my interpretation?
- Which wish lies beneath my anger?
- What might the other person have heard?
- Which agreement would be small and observable?
What is less likely to help
- Continuing at the height of anger.
- Attacking character instead of addressing behaviour.
- Pretending there is peace while nothing changes.
Explore in depth
Related podcast episodes
If you would like to explore further, you can listen here. The key ideas are already included on this page.
This episode cannot be played at the moment.
Support that fits
Would you like to consider your situation personally?
Learn about telephone and chat consultations or choose a suitable appointment directly, at your own pace.